I don’t write this to piss people off, no bad feelings ok? ;) But, to be honest, it annoys me a bit that some boybloggers are thinking it’s a good idea to tag the images they post with a watermark. That’s something that is perfectly fine if you’re the photographer who made the picture or the model on it but why do you think you should spoil and deface a good image by putting your big tag on it if you were not involved in the making of it? I do tag some photos too but only if they are explicitly made for this blog like the photos from Joe. But what’s the point of tagging something you just found somewhere else, something that doesn’t belong to you in any way?

 
Harmless example compared to some stuff out there

I mean, you know it’s too much if you can’t see the boy under the tag like here. It’s getting funny when one tag is getting is black-washed to add another one *sigh* So, please: leave Britney the photos alone. Ask other bloggers to link back to you if you feel like they are copying your stuff but don’t take credit for the work of others by implying it’s your photo by putting your name or URL on it. Art should be free and published but we should not modify it in such an ugly way.

Like I said: No bad feelings, just sayin’ ;)