ThePinkRabbit says:

Wow… I really thought there would be more girls here.

Jay says:

Isn’t there the choice for “else [comment please?]” missing?

And wait.. what about all those gay, bi, hetero girls? O_O

[Btw. I was *so* sure pinkrabbitgirl would have a gravatar in no time... I was wrong.]

kollio says:

i’d opt for “queer”, as it transcends the non-hetero orientations somehow ..

(and how did the people identifying as heterosexual get here? not that I’d mind though, maybe it’s the other anonymous girls)

louisdijon says:

i’m hetero, and i stay out of aesthetical reasons. if that’s okay - i can imagine it to be kind of annoying, if someone non-gay always points out “my, that’s SO aesthetical!”, while you gays find it beautiful and arousing.

Raptorschwanz says:

Milkboys is somewhat unique in that, as far as I can discern, the focus is actually more on aesthetic than sexuality, which allows and even invites girls and heterosexual men (and, yes, aliens) to appreciate the content here. I’m glad that we can all feel at home with the diversity that is present and not be hammering up virtual “No Girls Allowed” signs. We’re fortunate to have such an outstanding “museum” of boyhood beauty.

ThePinkRabbit says:

6 of us now! Be careful, boys ;)

and now I have my gravatar, Jay :D

MightyMightyM says:

doug - a pansexual is a person who is sexually interested in other people regardless of sex or gender, and anthrosexuality is being sexually attracted to humans, again regardless of sex or gender.

Personally I prefer the term queer.

Rimmer says:

@louisdijon and all -

‘Gay’ was a political and mutual-support movement in the 1980s. To be fully signed up, you had to be far-left socialist, ideologically promiscuous, and into weird sex and weird clothes: otherwise the leaders would snear at you for being “straight acting”. The gay movement claimed the word homosexual for its own.

That movement was important for a while. It created a political splash. It provided mutual support. But I never felt at home in it. I still find it impossible to say in public that I’m gay or homosexual and feel comfortable about it. Those words just don’t describe me.

I’m more than happy to say “this is my partner N”, who is clearly male, like me.

If I were single I’d be more than happy to say “I’m probably looking for a *man*, actually … or a nice boy, haha.”

But “gay” or “homosexual”? Keep your labels.

The politics is changing too. In the 1980s it was all about an oppressed minority, born that way, who couldn’t help the way they were, and needed the straight world’s generous tolerance of their sickness, to allow them to do their naughty things together in private.

Sod that!

I want to assert the right of *everyone* to shag whomsoever they will (consensually and not *too* publicly). Shagging (or marrying) a same sex partner is as valid a life choice as any other, and in many ways better (make your own list of reasons…).

Contemporary british teens (and, in my over-hearing, preteens as well) *get this*. Gay and Str8 are *so* last century, *so* uncool … self-limiting and kinda *sexist*. Bi is cool, the universal assumption. Anyone who isn’t totally bi needs to be a little bit embarrassed about it.

OK, I answered your survey. I put homosexual (grumbles). But really I’m bisexual: I like *men* and *boys*.

- Rrrr

[...] was surprised how many of you guys are bisexual [...]

max says:

okay … i’m queer - or gay - in the best sense of the word … does that suffice? :-)

Me... (Damon) says:

Am i bi if i would sleep with a women but not have a relationship with them?

GO BRITAIN!!!

sorry, sorry, i loose control sometimes…