Home
Contact
Answers
Comments
Contribute
Feeds[This is a guest article by Sidney and was first published at Inkplum]
Some gay artist’s today are such cowards. They’ll paint, sketch, do sculptures, photograph, film, even make holograms of any number of hairy, muscled, big cocked men, but are terrified of boys, and youths. It’s as if the youngster’s were made of plutonium or kryptonite. What was once a common subject for any serious artist has become the forbidden object that none may even acknowledge exists. Boys. There I said it,…BOYS!!!!!!! I was just knocking around the gay art, and comix book sites. Well the one thing they “ALL!” have in common is that apparently there are no males under 23 on any the of world’s they make up.
That’s another thing that piss’s me the hell off! Gays have a habit of identifying them between 23, and 30 as “Boys”. ‘The Fuck????!!!! You see this mental derangement at all the gay porn sites. So my dad was a “boy”, as were my uncles, and teachers when I was a kid. Sure they were,..Right.
Well okay, some very few art guys do celebrate boyhood. Like “Otto”. Yeah, him and Peter Colstee. That’s his stuff above. Colstee seems to sometimes admit that there ‘may’ be a few teenagers about. Just a few mind you. However mainstream gay artist’s would rather marry Vice President Cheney, and let him fuck them in the ass with his evil spiked schlong on the White House lawn during the annual Easter Egg Hunt. They’d rather Cheney’s thrusting six foot long demonic cock being jammed up their cowardly butt’s, and poking out of their boring mouths than paint a happy nude or semi-nude 14 year old boy. Humm, maybe if the kid put on a false beard, and glued fur to his chest them satanically reamed so-called “gay” artists might change their minds. No offense to my “Bear” pals out there, but ya see’s my point here. Sure bears is cute, and sexy even I can see that. Hey I ‘am’ Queer ya know, but a boy is a “Boy!” Dammit I want’s to see thousands of swell painting’s of our heart’s desire slapped up on gallery walls from here to the Ross Ice Sheet! ‘Can’t you just see it. Delicate boyish beauty shining down from all them art gallery walls. There they’ll be cheek by cheek with them hairy hunks,…as the G-ddess intended. Wonderful, we’d be in a world of beauty, and horny delights. It would make middle school class trips to the museum finally worthwhile. At last coffee table books ‘I’d’ actually open, and look through.
‘Thing that really piss’s me off though is that these cowardly mooks actually ‘do’ boy art! They hide it away though. Not only that, but when these fags bites the dust their families burns the whole shebang in the back yard. That’s the main reason we hardly have any tangible artifacts from Queer Boylove history. The fuckers burn it all. Every bit they can get their evil hands on. This goes for them so-called gay libraries. Most won’t take Boylover materials, and the few that do can’t be trusted not to destroy it. This btw is why I’ll never leave my stuff to these shits. I can see it now. I finally drops dead, probably after my 20th box of pies, and cream puff’s,…love them pasteries! Anyway I keels over in a lemon meringue coma, and all my Inkplum Angels, and faeries ends up in the hands of some pissed off reactionary lesbian librarians that was fucked in the ass by their father’s when they were 5, and think ‘I’m’ the same sort of creep.
Just swell.
What do you think my “comrad sisters” will do with my swell stuff.
“…got a match?”
Yeah you’re starting to get the picture. To sum up,…fuck them ‘all’ to hell!
Thank you, and Goodnight!
‘Watch ya back’s comrads, and put sugar in their gas tanks.
Stay Tuned.
April 23rd, 2008 at 23:39
What if these artists just aren’t into boys? It makes them a coward that they don’t like painting ‘happy 14 year olds’ nude?
Why don’t you paint a happy 14 year old?
April 24th, 2008 at 03:13
Even if a gay artist did have the ‘courage’ to use a boy as a subject it is likely that he would be arrested for child pornography and all his work destroyed. However, there are actually quite a few artists that like to focus mainly on youth both boy and girl (check out some of the links on this site). Of course I’m not sure how many are still alive though but as to whether they are gay or not doesn’t seem relevant to me. Then you have to factor in models and if a family is willing to let their child model. The simple fact is that young boys is a taboo subject so its going to be in the background whether you like it or not.
April 24th, 2008 at 06:28
Sidney is at his best when he is pissed off! I liked this too. I am so happy you have highlighted this in your blog!
Matt R.: You are living in a world totally devoid of historical perspective (even history as recent as a few decades old), and one that betrays your Western chauvinism even in today’s world.
Tyler: Why don’t you just crawl back under the sheets with your muscle-bound bear and close the door behind you?
April 24th, 2008 at 09:15
i can’t find the things you’are accusing matt r. of doing. please explain further.
it seems plausible to me that, as an artist who works with the beauty of the young, you eventually have to face such allegations.
will mcbride for example is an artist whose main interest lies on boys, their coming of age, .. his “Show Me”-works about sex education for example, books he crafted with a child psychatrist, - while initially published in germany in the 70s by a katholic publisher (!) and praised for it’s natural views (theoretical as well as visual) on the topic - nowadays are considered bare child pornography. in the usa it’s illegal to own them, in europe, all publishers have ceased printing because of the ongoing moral hassle arount them. it’s a shame, because the swiss psychiatrists’ remarks on emotional development in the context of friendship, love and sex and family are a damn good read, just as how mcbrides pictures are great.
April 24th, 2008 at 18:41
well the fun is the internet is there to SURF IT!!! It wouldnt be good if your average joe could just google naked boys ..and voila, than we would really b fucked and the EU and or USA would bann all boys material, because I am sure we r now in a religious conservative revival all thanx to extremist and more and more gets forbidden and watched!!.So lets look a little bit more and deeper on the net and the findings r more gratefying…FUCK YEAH!!GODDAMN BASTARDS anyway till next time, cheese and windmillcountry and grass..that kinda grass says bye bye STARBOY. FUCK EVERYDAY PEOPLE!!!
April 24th, 2008 at 20:29
Well, we have been in a moral hysteria over sex since the beginning of monotheism. But it really took off with the advent of the Christian era quickly followed by the Muslim era.
The real tragedy is that these fucking bastards have been able to force their sexual fascism on the entire world. Not too long ago lots of places in Asia were able to distance them from this monotheistic moral hysteria. No longer. If some country tries to keep the Christian NGOs out they go crying to the UN or Bush that they are denied religious freedom. Religious freedom to them means making everyone follow their dogma.
Even for the first half of the 20th century there were faint rays of hope in the West. No longer! It is a depressing sight to watch as I move around the globe.
April 24th, 2008 at 21:17
mr. pagan, what do you mean by places in asia, which were able to distance themselves from “..” ?
April 25th, 2008 at 05:01
Like Louisdijon I too don’t understand what I.R. is accussing me of. Anyway, I was just reading a recent A.P. story about a television station in Singapore being fined for showing a gay couple with a baby. Gay sex is illegal in Singapore and any depiction of it which shows it as a normal lifestyle is not allowed. Being gay is hard enough in some places so perhaps throwing boys into the mix just isn’t worth it to some people.
April 25th, 2008 at 05:26
Wow!!! There are some really ignorant people here. If some of you knew even a little of gay history, say more than what happened only in your mind for the last week, you wouldn’t ask these questions.
I’ll tell you this, most of you should go on your hands and knees and beg Sidney to teach you what is going on in the world today and how it evolved into what it is.
louisdijon, do your parents let you cross the street by yourself yet?
Matt R., I can tell by your question that you buy into the whole “gay lie” carefully crafted by the sexual fascists of all genders since 1980. May you always be happy with your fantasies!
April 25th, 2008 at 08:00
betty, i honestly don’t unterstand what is so offensive about my post. maybe you care to elaborate. also, go on and enlighten us on gay history, i’d be all ears. i wrote about will mcbride, whose books center around exactly what the blogposts author talks about. his stuff unfortunately is being outlawed nowadays.
April 25th, 2008 at 22:51
Sidney,
You RULE — so glad to read your post today. Yes as Betty Boop says, ‘We should all go on our hands and knees and beg you to teach us.”
Lukas (on hands and knees)
April 26th, 2008 at 04:28
Lukas! For heavens sakes get up. Thanks, but you don’t have to do any of that stuff. Just sacrifice a few goats to me, and we’ll call it a deal.
Anyway I didn’t mean to start a fist fight here. I just wanna see more naked boys hanging on walls is all. What’s wrong with that? Btw Josh your page looks neat.
It keeps getting better.
Inkplum needs a face lift. Maybe you can give me a hand with that when you get time.
Bless you all, and enjoy the spring, and summer!
April 26th, 2008 at 09:31
i completely agree…in so many words
April 27th, 2008 at 21:53
I would even go as far as claiming that teenage boys were the highest ideal of beauty for many centuries, even after the christianization of Europe. It seems that this has changed somewhere in the (bourgeois) 19th century, when they started to depict angels as women (see my homepage: http://home.arcor.de/berzelmayr/st-john.html). But in the first years of this century leading painters like Jacques Louis David were doing stuff like that: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/96/Jacques-Louis_David_004.jpg
and that: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/Sabine_women.jpg
It’s ridiculous, when “mainstream gays” are now acting as if their tastes would represent the majority and that ephebophiles would be “the fringe”.
May 3rd, 2008 at 00:58
Great rant! Thanks!