Cupid Playing with a Butterfly
by Antoine-Denis Chaudet (1763 - 1810)
Marble, 1802-1807 | Louvre, Paris

Chaudet went to the seine river in Paris to look for a model for this masterpiece. Approching the young nude Parisian boys swimming. There was a misunderstanding about what he wanted from a nude young boy. This landed him in jail. [boyneworleans]

The pose, the almost suave charm of the face, the delicate fingers, the refined treatment of the hair: everything expresses sensitivity, reserve, and grace. The sculptor has achieved a subtle balance between nature and the ideal, inherited from the 18th century.

    

Cupid is portrayed as a naked, unarmed adolescent whose sole attributes are his short wings. He seems to be engrossed in an innocent pastime. His amusement is not as harmless as it seems, though; the butterfly allowing itself to be seduced by his rose symbolizes the soul, Psyche in Greek. Imprisoned by Cupid, the soul soon experiences love’s torments rather than its pleasures. The graceful bas-relief friezes on the base develop the theme: if the butterfly tastes the juice of a basket of flowers, it is pinned down by chubby little cupids, one of whom enslaves it by harnessing it to his chariot. But the soul finally triumphs thanks to the bees: infuriated by the arrows shot at their hive, they swarm all over the cheeky imps. These scenes are inspired by the Idylls of Theocritus (3rd century BC), the most famous Greek poet of the Alexandrian era, and the delicateness of the carving expresses all their bucolic charm. [Louvre]

5 Responses to “Cupid and the Butterfly”
  1. Der Optimist Identicon Icon Der Optimist says:

    Nice ass at least. scnr

  2. Bericender Identicon Icon Bericender says:

    I think a trip to the Louvre is getting more and more interesting ;)

  3. Will Decker Identicon Icon Will Decker says:

    Thank Goodness for those pesky bees :-) Us!

  4. BoyMagnet Identicon Icon BoyMagnet says:

    Haha, the incident on the Seine is sweet. Any man wishing to capture a boy’s image must be suspect - they are beautiful, they are beautiful because they are sexy. Anybody looking must be looking at his cock, right?

    Nowadays, of course, to take a boy home we don’t need to ask him to spend hours naked, alone with us in a studio as Rudé did: the modern miracle of photography means we can snap him up in an instant. Maybe that’s one reason why they don’t bathe naked in the Seine any more. I still find it fascinating, though, that this exquisite piece of porn should have been praised as high art, and still is, in hypocritical times in which boys are banned from bathing naked in case the ‘wrong kind of person’ looks at them. Posh people, connoisseurs of fine art are, of course, immune from sexual perversion, so it’s OK for them to see as much cock as they want; I guess, through the even-more-modern miracle of performance and installation art, they’ll be able to have a good suck too.

  5. Jean Francois Identicon Icon Jean Francois says:

    I’m not entirely sure how you were able to misconstrued this as porn, BoyMagnet.

    art, noun: the quality, production, expression, or realm, according to aesthetic principles, of what is beautiful, appealing, or of more than ordinary significance.

    porn, noun: creative activity (writing or pictures or films etc.) of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire.

Leave a Reply